tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11017234.post111521981511108083..comments2023-11-16T07:12:40.867-05:00Comments on Dissoi Blogoi: A Saving, In Need of a PhenomenonUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11017234.post-1137966614284891272006-01-22T16:50:00.000-05:002006-01-22T16:50:00.000-05:00I hold something close to 3. How are we aware that...I hold something close to 3. How are we aware that seeing is going on (as opposed to hearing etc)? Is it by sight that one is aware that one is seeing (ie that the faculty of sight is the one that is operating right now)? <BR/>It seems that it would be by sight, because to see just is to get a visible object actualised, so one is ipso facto aware that it is vision, not hearing, that is going on. But actually that won't do: the rest of the chapter problematises the easy answer canvassed (hypothetically) at the beginning. So the final question is more complicated: not just how am I aware that I am seeing and hearing, but how am I aware of both those things and I can distinguish between them? <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://dissoiblogoi.blogspot.com/2005/05/saving-in-need-of-phenomenon.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="c dot osborne at uea dot ac dot uk">Catherine Osborne</A>Catherine Rowetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15356313351798903675noreply@blogger.com